

|
Volume 6, Edition 4 – July 2010 |
ATN in PROFILE
Any promises of additional funding for regional education initiatives
must be underpinned by sound policy rather than ‘band-aid’ solutions which
may undermine current successful initiatives. In commenting on the recent
announcement by the National Party, ATN Chair, Professor Ross Milbourne
says, “The commitment from the National Party to provide funding to help
regional Australians get to university is a welcome recognition of the
importance of higher education to the national economy. However, the ATN
seeks clarification about how and over what time the fund would be
allocated.
“What would be
disappointing is to see the EIF, which has had a significant impact on the
sector, redirected away from vital education infrastructure projects,”
Professor Milbourne said.
“The role of the EIF is to build a modern, productive, internationally
competitive Australian economy by supporting world‐leading,
strategically-focused infrastructure investments that will transform
Australian tertiary education and research. It is not the role of EIF to
support recurrent expenditure for a limited number of universities.
“These issues need a far more comprehensive investigation of the relative
costs of provision across the entire sector rather than a poorly thought out
band-aid solution which only underpins a small proportion of the nation’s
student load,” Professor Milbourne said.
“The ATN’s already established commitment to access and equity is well
recognised by Governments and within the communities in which each of our
five members operate. We seek a national policy framework which puts the
interests and needs of students first and leads to measures that will act as
an incentive for all students, be they disadvantaged by income, age or
geography.”